Mobility, best interests of the child - Andreas Solomos, Toronto Family Lawyer, Children's Aid cases, Divorce, Custody, International Abduction Hague Convention Applications and cases Civil Aspects Hearings Referrals from counsel respected Court proceedings Urgent Motions Variations Negotiations Legal Ontario Canada Free Initial Consultation Information and Articles

Go to content

Main menu

Mobility, best interests of the child

Mobility, best interests of the child, variation of custody and access orders, material change in circumstances
The parent applying for a change in the custody or access order must meet the threshold requirement of demonstrating a material change in the circumstances affecting the child.  For that threshold to be met, the judge must be satisfied of (1) a change in the condition, means, needs or circumstances of the child or in the ability of the parents to meet the needs of the child, (2) which materially affects the child, and (3) which was either not foreseen or could not have been reasonably contemplated by the judge who made the initial order.  An application to vary custody cannot serve as an indirect route of appeal from the initial custody order.  The judge must assume the correctness of the initial order and consider only the change in circumstances since the order was issued.

If the threshold is met, the judge on the application must embark on a fresh inquiry into the best interests of the child, having regard to all the relevant circumstances relating to the child's needs and the ability of the respective parents to satisfy them.  The focus of the inquiry is not the interests and rights of the parents.  Each case turns on its own unique circumstances and the only issue is the best interest of the child in the particular circumstances of the case.  Section 17(5) of the Divorce Act directs that the judge must consider the child's best interests "by reference" to the material change in circumstances.  However, the inquiry cannot be confined to that change alone, isolated from the other factors bearing on the child's best interests.  The inquiry, which is based on the findings of fact of the judge who made the initial or previous order as well as the evidence of the new circumstances, does not begin with a legal presumption in favour of the custodial parent, although the custodial parent's views are entitled to great respect.  Once the applicant has discharged the burden of showing a material change in circumstances, both parents should bear the evidentiary burden of demonstrating where the best interests of the child lie.  In assessing the best interests of the child, the judge should more particularly consider, inter alia:  (a) the existing custody arrangement and relationship between the child and the custodial parent; (b) the existing access arrangement and the relationship between the child and the access parent; (c) the desirability of maximizing contact between  the child and both parents; (d) the views of the child; (e) the custodial parent’s reason for moving, only in the exceptional case where it is relevant to that parent’s ability to meet the needs of the child; (f) disruption to the child of a change in custody; and (g) disruption to the child consequent on removal from family, schools, and the community he or she has come to know.  The "maximum contact" principle mentioned in ss. 16(10) and 17(9) of the Divorce Act is mandatory but not absolute and the judge is only obliged to respect it to the extent that such contact is consistent with the child's best interests.  As set out in s. 16(9) of the Act, parental conduct does not enter the analysis unless it relates to the ability of the parent to meet the needs of the child.  In the end, the importance of the child's remaining with the parent to whose custody it has become accustomed in the new location must be weighed against the continuance of full contact with the child's access parent, its extended family and its community.  The ultimate question in every case is this:  what is in the best interests of the child in all the circumstances, old as well as new?

Back to content | Back to main menu